<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu vs RHEL in enterprise computing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1072/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1072</link>
	<description>Planetary perspectives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 07:56:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1072/comment-page-2#comment-394924</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=1072#comment-394924</guid>
		<description>@fossfreedom

We support LTS-to-LTS upgrades, so yes, you could stay on 12.04 LTS, then move to 16.04 LTS (in our current testing plan we would test the migration from 12.04 to 14.04 and then to 16.04, not directly).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@fossfreedom</p>
<p>We support LTS-to-LTS upgrades, so yes, you could stay on 12.04 LTS, then move to 16.04 LTS (in our current testing plan we would test the migration from 12.04 to 14.04 and then to 16.04, not directly).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fossfreedom</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1072/comment-page-2#comment-394873</link>
		<dc:creator>fossfreedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 11:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=1072#comment-394873</guid>
		<description>Mark - its not clear what the LTS upgrade strategy is beyond 12.04.

i.e. - could a 12.04 business jump to 16.04 directly - i.e. plan to upgrade in 4 years time?  If a 12.04 user keeps going for the full 5 years - can we assume they need to first move to 17.04 ... 17.10 and then 18.04 LTS - doesnt sound ideal for business users.

Any chance of clarification?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8211; its not clear what the LTS upgrade strategy is beyond 12.04.</p>
<p>i.e. &#8211; could a 12.04 business jump to 16.04 directly &#8211; i.e. plan to upgrade in 4 years time?  If a 12.04 user keeps going for the full 5 years &#8211; can we assume they need to first move to 17.04 &#8230; 17.10 and then 18.04 LTS &#8211; doesnt sound ideal for business users.</p>
<p>Any chance of clarification?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ampers Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1072/comment-page-2#comment-394817</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Ampers Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 08:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=1072#comment-394817</guid>
		<description>@mark @lillian

Life always goes on. There are so many examples in this world where people have thought something has ended, but on it goes. Mark is right when he says your fears won&#039;t materialise.

Ampers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mark @lillian</p>
<p>Life always goes on. There are so many examples in this world where people have thought something has ended, but on it goes. Mark is right when he says your fears won&#8217;t materialise.</p>
<p>Ampers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1072/comment-page-2#comment-394816</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 08:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=1072#comment-394816</guid>
		<description>@Lilian

Customers who want work done on the kernel, and hardware providers who are shipping new silicon and want a kernel to show it off, will always drive kernel development. Canonical is just as effective a conduit for that as any other company, so I don&#039;t think your fears will materialise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lilian</p>
<p>Customers who want work done on the kernel, and hardware providers who are shipping new silicon and want a kernel to show it off, will always drive kernel development. Canonical is just as effective a conduit for that as any other company, so I don&#8217;t think your fears will materialise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilian</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1072/comment-page-2#comment-394805</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 05:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=1072#comment-394805</guid>
		<description>If Ubuntu will take over RedHat customers that will be very bad news. 60% of the Linux Kernel is written and maintained by RedHat, a bunch of good software is written by RedHat and they contribute it to the Open Source World. While Canonical... If RedHat looses customers then it won&#039;t support Linux so much then Canonical wouldn&#039;t be able to say that look how good our operating system is because almost all the stuff they are using is actually RedHat&#039;s work... Bye, bye RedHat equals Bye, bye Ubuntu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Ubuntu will take over RedHat customers that will be very bad news. 60% of the Linux Kernel is written and maintained by RedHat, a bunch of good software is written by RedHat and they contribute it to the Open Source World. While Canonical&#8230; If RedHat looses customers then it won&#8217;t support Linux so much then Canonical wouldn&#8217;t be able to say that look how good our operating system is because almost all the stuff they are using is actually RedHat&#8217;s work&#8230; Bye, bye RedHat equals Bye, bye Ubuntu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j03</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1072/comment-page-2#comment-394658</link>
		<dc:creator>j03</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 02:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=1072#comment-394658</guid>
		<description>All you Ubunutu haters are funny. You&#039;re just mad because your peepees are getting smacked down. Ubuntu should be hailed and respected - for bringing an attractive open source desktop OS to the masses and away from the destructive corporatocracy which has made them dumb sheep-like beings for so many years :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All you Ubunutu haters are funny. You&#8217;re just mad because your peepees are getting smacked down. Ubuntu should be hailed and respected &#8211; for bringing an attractive open source desktop OS to the masses and away from the destructive corporatocracy which has made them dumb sheep-like beings for so many years <img src='http://www.markshuttleworth.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubuntu ultrapassa o Red Hat Enterprise Linux &#124; DPKG</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1072/comment-page-2#comment-394601</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubuntu ultrapassa o Red Hat Enterprise Linux &#124; DPKG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=1072#comment-394601</guid>
		<description>[...] Shuttleworth  demonstrou entusiasmo em seu blog pessoal ao relatar que empresas começaram a adotar a distribuição Ubuntu, ao invés [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shuttleworth  demonstrou entusiasmo em seu blog pessoal ao relatar que empresas começaram a adotar a distribuição Ubuntu, ao invés [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shuttleworth: Ubuntu rockets up at enterprises &#124; DailyTechWire</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1072/comment-page-2#comment-394595</link>
		<dc:creator>Shuttleworth: Ubuntu rockets up at enterprises &#124; DailyTechWire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=1072#comment-394595</guid>
		<description>[...] data presented in a in a blog post by Ubuntu project founder and &#8220;benevolent dictator&#8221; Mark Shuttleworth is any [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] data presented in a in a blog post by Ubuntu project founder and &#8220;benevolent dictator&#8221; Mark Shuttleworth is any [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubuntu, le aziende migrano in massa? &#124; infropy - information entropy</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1072/comment-page-2#comment-394589</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubuntu, le aziende migrano in massa? &#124; infropy - information entropy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=1072#comment-394589</guid>
		<description>[...] brillerebbe in particolare nei confronti di Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), dice Shuttleworth, citando i dati di W3techs: tra marzo 2011 e marzo 2012, Ubuntu avrebbe superato Red [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] brillerebbe in particolare nei confronti di Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), dice Shuttleworth, citando i dati di W3techs: tra marzo 2011 e marzo 2012, Ubuntu avrebbe superato Red [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Las empresas prefieren Ubuntu a Red Hat &#124; TechWeekEurope España</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1072/comment-page-2#comment-394585</link>
		<dc:creator>Las empresas prefieren Ubuntu a Red Hat &#124; TechWeekEurope España</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=1072#comment-394585</guid>
		<description>[...] en lo que sabemos de la nueva modalidad de servicios, como el cloud computing y el Big Data”, comenta [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] en lo que sabemos de la nueva modalidad de servicios, como el cloud computing y el Big Data”, comenta [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
