<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Light: the new look of Ubuntu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/308/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/308</link>
	<description>Planetary perspectives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 07:56:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jade</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/308/comment-page-4#comment-325068</link>
		<dc:creator>Jade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 21:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=308#comment-325068</guid>
		<description>What about these left-sided glyphs in the new theme of Ubuntu 10.04 ?
Is there a reason to copy Apple&#039;s approach ?
I like Ubuntu, but it seems I will have to hack away at the theme to get the old look &amp; feel back into it.
The theme itself looks great, but left-sided glyphs are a mistake, pure &amp; simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about these left-sided glyphs in the new theme of Ubuntu 10.04 ?<br />
Is there a reason to copy Apple&#8217;s approach ?<br />
I like Ubuntu, but it seems I will have to hack away at the theme to get the old look &amp; feel back into it.<br />
The theme itself looks great, but left-sided glyphs are a mistake, pure &amp; simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergey</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/308/comment-page-4#comment-324876</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 08:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=308#comment-324876</guid>
		<description>Mark, the king is naked, window buttons on the left are very uncomfortable. 

&gt; You shifted the minimize, maximize, shut down buttons to the upper left corner. Some users are freaking out, but it’s a non-issue. 
&gt; You get used to it in a matter of days.

You have just a few hours to satisfy a new user. He will not use ubuntu after that, if he hasn&#039;t liked it. And he will not find how to change such ugly defaults within that time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, the king is naked, window buttons on the left are very uncomfortable. </p>
<p>&gt; You shifted the minimize, maximize, shut down buttons to the upper left corner. Some users are freaking out, but it’s a non-issue.<br />
&gt; You get used to it in a matter of days.</p>
<p>You have just a few hours to satisfy a new user. He will not use ubuntu after that, if he hasn&#8217;t liked it. And he will not find how to change such ugly defaults within that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Kubuntu branding &#171; Jonathan&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/308/comment-page-4#comment-324844</link>
		<dc:creator>New Kubuntu branding &#171; Jonathan&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=308#comment-324844</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;k&#8221; in there is a placeholder, as the new Ubuntu font that Mark Shuttleworth recently blogged about is still in its infancy. But before you jump to conclusions and declare the lack of a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;k&#8221; in there is a placeholder, as the new Ubuntu font that Mark Shuttleworth recently blogged about is still in its infancy. But before you jump to conclusions and declare the lack of a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/308/comment-page-4#comment-324757</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=308#comment-324757</guid>
		<description>Expected nothing less of Dalton Maag. Great stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expected nothing less of Dalton Maag. Great stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/308/comment-page-4#comment-324754</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=308#comment-324754</guid>
		<description>Absolutely gorgeous work. Very professional, polished and good looking desktop. I have been using Lucid since alpha 2, and it is really an excellent computing experience. Sure, there are new changes to get used to, but I disagree with most critical posts: I like the button layout, it is consistent and intuitive; the colours are inviting and fresh. I am really excited to know what you are preparing for us for Lucid +1.

Brave, daring and creative. Please, do not stop.

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely gorgeous work. Very professional, polished and good looking desktop. I have been using Lucid since alpha 2, and it is really an excellent computing experience. Sure, there are new changes to get used to, but I disagree with most critical posts: I like the button layout, it is consistent and intuitive; the colours are inviting and fresh. I am really excited to know what you are preparing for us for Lucid +1.</p>
<p>Brave, daring and creative. Please, do not stop.</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/308/comment-page-4#comment-324679</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=308#comment-324679</guid>
		<description>Love the new look, but didn&#039;t mind customizing the old one. However I have been using Linux since 2004 and my home has been windows free since 2006 and Lucid beta 1 is the first OS I have had friends compliment and when I tell them that the look is out of the box they can&#039;t believe and are ready to try it on their own. Great job to Mark and the whole staff as well as the community, this is a major step forward for us all. C&#039;MON APRIL 29!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the new look, but didn&#8217;t mind customizing the old one. However I have been using Linux since 2004 and my home has been windows free since 2006 and Lucid beta 1 is the first OS I have had friends compliment and when I tell them that the look is out of the box they can&#8217;t believe and are ready to try it on their own. Great job to Mark and the whole staff as well as the community, this is a major step forward for us all. C&#8217;MON APRIL 29!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/308/comment-page-4#comment-324677</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=308#comment-324677</guid>
		<description>Was the new theme usability tested?  It seems that some basic testing would have picked up the issue with the buttons being too close to the Edit menu.

I dislike almost everything about the changes - however I could be convinced if there was some usability data justifying what&#039;s been changed, particularly the window buttons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was the new theme usability tested?  It seems that some basic testing would have picked up the issue with the buttons being too close to the Edit menu.</p>
<p>I dislike almost everything about the changes &#8211; however I could be convinced if there was some usability data justifying what&#8217;s been changed, particularly the window buttons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/308/comment-page-4#comment-324675</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 05:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=308#comment-324675</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s one simple request... can the font look good when *not* smoothed, like the MS family fonts (ie: Arial, Tahoma, etc...)?

A quick search of the intrawebs reveals that many users don&#039;t like smoothed fonts, some even complaining of headaches or the like. Unfortunately, none of the current *nix fonts look good if they&#039;re aliased. It would make me really happy if the new fonts looked great in their unadulterated form, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s one simple request&#8230; can the font look good when *not* smoothed, like the MS family fonts (ie: Arial, Tahoma, etc&#8230;)?</p>
<p>A quick search of the intrawebs reveals that many users don&#8217;t like smoothed fonts, some even complaining of headaches or the like. Unfortunately, none of the current *nix fonts look good if they&#8217;re aliased. It would make me really happy if the new fonts looked great in their unadulterated form, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://www.markshuttleworth.co&#8230; &#8211; Tanner Helland (dot) Com</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/308/comment-page-4#comment-324661</link>
		<dc:creator>http://www.markshuttleworth.co&#8230; &#8211; Tanner Helland (dot) Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=308#comment-324661</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/308 &#8211; now THIS is how logo and branding is meant to be done. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/308" rel="nofollow">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/308</a> &#8211; now THIS is how logo and branding is meant to be done. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forrest</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/308/comment-page-4#comment-324649</link>
		<dc:creator>Forrest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=308#comment-324649</guid>
		<description>(Examines new logo)

Huge swooping curves everywhere but for a thin crimped &quot;t&quot;? Did someone declare &quot;t&quot; deprecated?

Maybe you should italicize it so it doesn&#039;t look so squished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Examines new logo)</p>
<p>Huge swooping curves everywhere but for a thin crimped &#8220;t&#8221;? Did someone declare &#8220;t&#8221; deprecated?</p>
<p>Maybe you should italicize it so it doesn&#8217;t look so squished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
