<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All the other guys are not wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/661/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/661</link>
	<description>Planetary perspectives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 15:33:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/661/comment-page-3#comment-369396</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=661#comment-369396</guid>
		<description>Hiya NK - it&#039;s WordPress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya NK &#8211; it&#8217;s WordPress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N.K. McDougall</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/661/comment-page-3#comment-369232</link>
		<dc:creator>N.K. McDougall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=661#comment-369232</guid>
		<description>Hi there would you mind sharing which blog platform you&#039;re using? I&#039;m planning to start my own blog soon but I&#039;m having a tough time making a decision between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your design and style seems different then most blogs and I&#039;m looking for something unique.                  P.S My apologies for getting off-topic but I had to ask!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there would you mind sharing which blog platform you&#8217;re using? I&#8217;m planning to start my own blog soon but I&#8217;m having a tough time making a decision between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your design and style seems different then most blogs and I&#8217;m looking for something unique.                  P.S My apologies for getting off-topic but I had to ask!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/661/comment-page-3#comment-365479</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 04:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=661#comment-365479</guid>
		<description>Give it a break, Shutleworth. You are starting to sound a lot like Steve Ballmer.

All your recent posts and talks have been mostly focused around how individual free software contributers should be increasing your bank balance, which is quite frankly disgusting. Perhaps it&#039;s not transparent enough for most people to see but I can assure you, an ever-increasing number of people are becoming sick of it.

The reason that people percieve you as being at war with Gnome is because most of the folks there are (fortunately) smart enough to see through your backhanded &quot;generosity&quot; and are actively trying to avoid your tainted &quot;suggestions&quot;.

Canonical is probably a bigger threat to Free Software than any proprietary software company is right now. Without trying to sound like the proverbial conspiracy theorist - I wouldn&#039;t be at all suprised to learn that you&#039;re actually a Microsoft shill. I bet you and Ballmer have a big laugh about it down at the strip club.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give it a break, Shutleworth. You are starting to sound a lot like Steve Ballmer.</p>
<p>All your recent posts and talks have been mostly focused around how individual free software contributers should be increasing your bank balance, which is quite frankly disgusting. Perhaps it&#8217;s not transparent enough for most people to see but I can assure you, an ever-increasing number of people are becoming sick of it.</p>
<p>The reason that people percieve you as being at war with Gnome is because most of the folks there are (fortunately) smart enough to see through your backhanded &#8220;generosity&#8221; and are actively trying to avoid your tainted &#8220;suggestions&#8221;.</p>
<p>Canonical is probably a bigger threat to Free Software than any proprietary software company is right now. Without trying to sound like the proverbial conspiracy theorist &#8211; I wouldn&#8217;t be at all suprised to learn that you&#8217;re actually a Microsoft shill. I bet you and Ballmer have a big laugh about it down at the strip club.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Levine</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/661/comment-page-3#comment-355757</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=661#comment-355757</guid>
		<description>Today I saw a long review of Unity on Tom&#039;s Hardware and it looks fairly positive. Only let down is that not all users can try it (due to hardware, myself included) but the future looks nice. At times breaking the status-quo is equally important..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I saw a long review of Unity on Tom&#8217;s Hardware and it looks fairly positive. Only let down is that not all users can try it (due to hardware, myself included) but the future looks nice. At times breaking the status-quo is equally important..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Linux</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/661/comment-page-3#comment-354836</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Linux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 19:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=661#comment-354836</guid>
		<description>What I care about most is an easy to use configurable desktop environment.  At the moment that seems to be Gnome 2.30.2.  Unity is a total loser for me and Gnome Shell doesn&#039;t seem to be an actual offering.  All the he said, she said makes little difference until one or the the other actually comes up with a user friendly desktop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I care about most is an easy to use configurable desktop environment.  At the moment that seems to be Gnome 2.30.2.  Unity is a total loser for me and Gnome Shell doesn&#8217;t seem to be an actual offering.  All the he said, she said makes little difference until one or the the other actually comes up with a user friendly desktop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natty and Unity at WMLUG &#124; Ben Rousch&#039;s Cluster of Bleep</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/661/comment-page-3#comment-352160</link>
		<dc:creator>Natty and Unity at WMLUG &#124; Ben Rousch&#039;s Cluster of Bleep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 21:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=661#comment-352160</guid>
		<description>[...] it all here because I covered some of this in a previous blog post, Mark Shuttleworth has several good blog posts about it, and a Google search for Unity will get you more than you could ever [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it all here because I covered some of this in a previous blog post, Mark Shuttleworth has several good blog posts about it, and a Google search for Unity will get you more than you could ever [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubuntu 11.10 将搭载 GNOME 3 + Unity : OSMSG</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/661/comment-page-3#comment-352036</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubuntu 11.10 将搭载 GNOME 3 + Unity : OSMSG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 03:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=661#comment-352036</guid>
		<description>[...] GNOME 3 核心开发者之一 Dave Neary 的这篇文章和 Mark Shuttleworth 的回应。这在 GNOME Shell 和 Unity 之争中算是一个代表性的事件，Unity 团队和 GNOME [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GNOME 3 核心开发者之一 Dave Neary 的这篇文章和 Mark Shuttleworth 的回应。这在 GNOME Shell 和 Unity 之争中算是一个代表性的事件，Unity 团队和 GNOME [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubuntu 11.10 将搭载 GNOME 3 + Unity_Ubuntu新闻资讯 &#124; UbuntuSoft</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/661/comment-page-3#comment-351964</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubuntu 11.10 将搭载 GNOME 3 + Unity_Ubuntu新闻资讯 &#124; UbuntuSoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 15:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=661#comment-351964</guid>
		<description>[...] GNOME 3 核心开发者之一 Dave Neary 的这篇文章和 Mark Shuttleworth 的回应。这在 GNOME Shell 和 Unity 之争中算是一个代表性的事件，Unity 团队和 GNOME [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GNOME 3 核心开发者之一 Dave Neary 的这篇文章和 Mark Shuttleworth 的回应。这在 GNOME Shell 和 Unity 之争中算是一个代表性的事件，Unity 团队和 GNOME [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.Sturm</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/661/comment-page-3#comment-351569</link>
		<dc:creator>T.Sturm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=661#comment-351569</guid>
		<description>Unity ist rein bedienphilosophisch eine Katastrophe… Zähle mal die Klicks, bis du das Programm gefunden hast, welches du verwenden möchtest… im vergleich zu Gnome 2. Wer sucht der findet. Wer dienstlich nichts mit Linux zu tun hat, sondern vor eine Windows-Maschine gezwungen wird, wird an Unity nur kurzfristig Spaß haben, wenn überhaut… Unity ist noch nicht einmal schick… Das können Andere weitaus besser. Wenn auch Gnome 3 nicht der bedienphilosophische Hit der Zukunft ist und sich auch dort bei einigen Anwender (und vor allem Neulingen) die Haare sträuben. Man muss sich bei solchen Aktionen der Entwickler mal fragen, wa sie eigentlich so den ganzen Tag machen. Statt ein Linux-System auf die Beine zu stellen, dass endlich mal vernünftig und stabil läuft, daß daß System einen ordentlichen Treibersupport bekommt – wird eine Bedienoberfläche zusammen geschustert, an derer die Zielgruppe Mensch verzweifelt und alle Meinungen auseinandergehen. Ich habe Unity installiert und versucht meine Arbeiten wie bisher auszuführen. Der typische Microzoff…-Effekt tritt ein: Zeitverschwendung beim Ausführen alltäglicher Dinge am Computer, statt sich auf die wesentlichen Dinge konzentrieren zu können. Computer sollen dem Menschen die Arbeit erleichtern und Zeit für wichtigere Dinge freimachen… hat Microsft mal versprochen (vor ca 20 Jahren?) aber bis heute hatte ausschließlich Windows das Privileg dem Menschen seine (begrenzte) Lebenszeit zu stehlen… Unity ist auf dem besten Weg Windows dieses Privileg streitig zu machen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unity ist rein bedienphilosophisch eine Katastrophe… Zähle mal die Klicks, bis du das Programm gefunden hast, welches du verwenden möchtest… im vergleich zu Gnome 2. Wer sucht der findet. Wer dienstlich nichts mit Linux zu tun hat, sondern vor eine Windows-Maschine gezwungen wird, wird an Unity nur kurzfristig Spaß haben, wenn überhaut… Unity ist noch nicht einmal schick… Das können Andere weitaus besser. Wenn auch Gnome 3 nicht der bedienphilosophische Hit der Zukunft ist und sich auch dort bei einigen Anwender (und vor allem Neulingen) die Haare sträuben. Man muss sich bei solchen Aktionen der Entwickler mal fragen, wa sie eigentlich so den ganzen Tag machen. Statt ein Linux-System auf die Beine zu stellen, dass endlich mal vernünftig und stabil läuft, daß daß System einen ordentlichen Treibersupport bekommt – wird eine Bedienoberfläche zusammen geschustert, an derer die Zielgruppe Mensch verzweifelt und alle Meinungen auseinandergehen. Ich habe Unity installiert und versucht meine Arbeiten wie bisher auszuführen. Der typische Microzoff…-Effekt tritt ein: Zeitverschwendung beim Ausführen alltäglicher Dinge am Computer, statt sich auf die wesentlichen Dinge konzentrieren zu können. Computer sollen dem Menschen die Arbeit erleichtern und Zeit für wichtigere Dinge freimachen… hat Microsft mal versprochen (vor ca 20 Jahren?) aber bis heute hatte ausschließlich Windows das Privileg dem Menschen seine (begrenzte) Lebenszeit zu stehlen… Unity ist auf dem besten Weg Windows dieses Privileg streitig zu machen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diego Viola</title>
		<link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/661/comment-page-3#comment-351167</link>
		<dc:creator>Diego Viola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 22:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/?p=661#comment-351167</guid>
		<description>Please make Wayland a reality, Mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please make Wayland a reality, Mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
